Johnson & Condon News

Minnesota Supreme Court affirms an employer is not required to pay attorney fees incurred in connection with an employer’s petition of the date of onset of PTD.

May 11th, 2012

Read More…

Minnesota Court of Appeals Enforces UIM Limits-Less-Paid Provision In Motorcycle Policy Despite Apparent Drafting or Printing Error

April 30th, 2012

Read More…

Minnesota Supreme Court affirms out-of-state medical providers treating a work comp claimant are paid based on the fee schedule of the state where the claimant received medical treatment.

April 18th, 2012

Read More…

MN Supreme Court Reinstates $24 Million Wrongful Death Verdict Against Railroad in Frazier v. BNSF Railway Co.

April 11th, 2012

Read More…

Allison Haley will present at a National Business Institute webinar, “Medicare Set-Asides in Personal Injury Settlements” on April 25, 2012.

April 3rd, 2012

Reg­is­ter Now

Johnson & Condon Obtains Summary Judgment Dismissal of Large Premises Liability Claim

March 27th, 2012

Min­neapo­lis, MN

In Jan­u­ary 2010, Plain­tiff slipped and fell on a patch of ice while exit­ing her vehi­cle near the rear load­ing area of a metro fur­ni­ture store.  Plain­tiff alleged she under­went surgery and later became entirely dis­abled, requir­ing mil­lions of dol­lars in future health care costs.  Plain­tiff brought suit against the owner of the prop­erty, the prop­erty man­ager, and the con­tract main­te­nance com­pany.  The Premises Lia­bil­ity Defense Team of Robert E. Kud­erer and Jenna M. Pow­ers rep­re­sented the prop­erty man­ager and its main­te­nance contractor.

On March 6, 2012, the case was dis­missed at the sum­mary judg­ment stage because none of the Defen­dants owed Plain­tiff a duty of care.  Sher­burne County Judge Thomas D. Hayes found that the ice Plain­tiff slipped on was not only open and obvi­ous, but so obvi­ously dan­ger­ous that Defen­dants did not owe her a legal duty of care, cit­ing her sta­tus as a life­long Min­nesota res­i­dent and depo­si­tion tes­ti­mony that the ice patch was vis­i­ble.  The court rejected Plaintiff’s argu­ment that she was dis­tracted and that Defen­dants were liable despite the obvi­ous ice hazard.

One-Way Indemnity

March 14th, 2012

St. Paul, MN — Min­nesota Truck­ing Association

The MTA spon­sored pro­hi­bi­tion on one way indem­nity (SF 1687) has yet to be heard in the Sen­ate Com­merce Com­mit­tee. That same com­mit­tee acted as a road­block last year. The lob­by­ing team met with Sen­a­tor Ger­lach, chair of that com­mit­tee, last week and were told unless com­pro­mise could be reached with Read the rest of this entry »

Johnson & Condon Trial Team Obtains Dismissal of Plaintiff’s Claims in Premises Liability Case

March 12th, 2012

Min­neapo­lis, MN

Plain­tiff brought a premises lia­bil­ity claim against a prop­erty man­age­ment com­pany claim­ing they were neg­li­gent in main­tain­ing her rental unit in Bloom­ing­ton, MN. After a 3-day trial Read the rest of this entry »

Johnson & Condon Trial Team Obtains Dismissal of Plaintiff’s Claims in Credit Card Liability Case

March 12th, 2012

Min­neapo­lis, MN

In Jan­u­ary 2009, the Plain­tiff ate at the Defendant’s quick ser­vice restau­rant and paid for the meal with a credit card.

Read the rest of this entry »

Johnson & Condon Trial Team Obtains Dismissal of Plaintiff’s Claims in Transportation Liability Case

March 8th, 2012

Min­neapo­lis, MN

On Decem­ber 28, 2007, the Plain­tiff was rear-ended on I-94 near Maple Grove, MN after a semi-tractor owned by the Defen­dant rear-ended the vehi­cle behind her, caus­ing Read the rest of this entry »